The poor image quality in the last post has bothered me, and I have now (back from a week of vacation) rescanned both pages while allowing the scanner to choose its setup automatically. It’s a bit better now (ultimately the best mode for sharing notebook sketches is perhaps video), and I realize in any case that I should quickly proceed to Loomis’ sections on lips and eyes, for all these faces look very grumpy indeed :)

loomis1_color.jpg
loomis2_color.jpg

Andrew Loomis

May 18, 2007

Yesterday I came across information on Andrew Loomis and his book Drawing the Head and Hands (1956), obviously a long-time classic but hitherto unknown to me. It for instance contains very enchanting portraits of Eisenhower-era girls in its later sections. Early on Loomis insists that all heads should be constructed from round ball shapes, and while keeping their three-dimensionality constantly in mind. This is a welcome step forward from the grid-based technique I’ve been depending on lately, and so I’ve done two pages worth of exercises. Here is one … (pencil/Moleskine notebook, 13 x 21 cm)

loomis_updated.jpg

Hopeless (continued)

May 17, 2007

Despite my original practice goal, today I quickly lost patience with copying the multitude of exact original lines. As a result, I was able to finish this work in a single session, which is again a first for this humble painter.

Here I also gave water-miscible oil paint a first try, and experienced them as convenience colors, no more. Especially the titanium white in my basic set had a gum-like quality, which even made the tube burst and leak when I pressed too hard to release some paint. I will perhaps move back to regular oil colors despite of some health concerns about using turpentine in my small apartment. (water-miscible oil/canvas, 19.5 x 19.5 cm)

hopeless_2.jpg

Hopeless

May 10, 2007

In looking ahead at continuing my oil painting experiments, I thought it may be fun to take inspiration from a Roy Lichtenstein painting such as Hopeless (1963) next. Its selection of colors is very simple, and since it itself reproduces comics artwork, a lot depends on how the dark lines are drawn, how their widths are varied, etc. All in all this should give ample opportunity for practicing with a fine brush. I’ve now prepared a precursor sketch (pencil/paper, 17 x 17 cm).

hopeless_1_400px.jpg

I made some more progress on the painting and added another shot to the original post below. Hurray, looks as if this may become my first complete proper oil painting ever.

I am an admirer of the Hudson River school of painters, and their complex depiction of light in naturalistic landscape paintings. I first encountered this art when seeing Sanford Robinson Gifford’s A Gorge in the Mountains (1862) at the New York Metropolitan Museum, and I remember staying in front of that painting for quite a while.

Now I don’t know yet what exact techniques Gifford and his colleagues were using, and I’m obviously painting at a much more basic level. But I also recently obtained a copy of The Big Book of Painting Nature in Oil, which I find quite attractive and useful. Among its more than hundred lesson topics is one (“Translating a Tree’s Skeleton at Sunset”) that achieves a somewhat reminiscent impression of the sky with simple means.

So far I took step one, i.e. prepared the background. My sky ended up a bit more red (less transparent and yellow) than the painting in the book (and altogether too expressionistic for Hudson River school principles, I would imagine), but the gradient came out well (better than the image actually shows). I’m quite happy with the result so far, because I have learned a new technique with a fan brush. Having had some droplets of color sprayed on my T-shirt and curtain was also part of that lesson, and reminds me that having a separate room as a studio would be nice. Oh well, more to come …

trees_skeleton_at_sunset_1.jpg trees_skeleton_at_sunset_2.jpg
step 1: background step 2: some foreground